
Latest & Upcoming Law Changes
Stay informed about essential HR and employment law updates to ensure your business remains compliant:
-
Upcoming Employment Law Changes – New regulations or amendments affecting employment contracts, redundancy, and employee rights.
-
Minimum Wage & Pay Transparency – Changes in the minimum wage, salary reporting, and ensuring equal pay practices.
-
Flexible Working Rights – Developments in the right to request flexible working, including updates on hybrid and remote work policies.
-
Diversity & Inclusion Regulations – New requirements for diversity reporting and inclusion policies.
-
GDPR & Data Protection – Updates on data protection laws and how they impact employee records and handling personal information.

Best HR Practices
Implementing HR best practices helps create a productive, compliant, and positive workplace:
-
Employee Relations Management – Handling grievances, disciplinary actions, and employee complaints in a fair, transparent manner.
-
Absence & Attendance Management – Best practices for managing sickness, absences, and long-term health-related leave.
-
Performance Management – Establishing clear goals, conducting regular feedback sessions, and supporting employee development.
-
Training & Development – Implementing ongoing learning opportunities to upskill employees and maintain a competitive workforce.
-
Employee Wellbeing – Creating policies that promote mental health support, work-life balance, and stress management.

Best Practice Procedures for Handling Employee Relations Cases
Best Practice Procedures for Handling Employee Relations Cases
Employee relations issues require thorough investigation, consistency, and adherence to organizational policies. Below are the key best practice procedures for handling different types of employee relations cases.
1. Grievance Handling:
Step 1: Acknowledge the Grievance
-
Upon receipt, acknowledge the grievance within 5 working days, outlining the process to be followed and the timeline for resolution.
Step 2: Investigate the Grievance
-
Appoint an impartial investigator to collect evidence, conduct interviews with the complainant and involved parties, and review relevant documentation.
Step 3: Decision-Making
-
Assess the evidence gathered and decide whether the grievance is upheld or dismissed. Ensure that the decision aligns with company policies and fairness.
Step 4: Communicate the Outcome
-
Provide the complainant and other relevant parties with the decision in writing, including any actions that will be taken or why the grievance is not upheld.
Step 5: Review the Process
-
Review the grievance procedure to ensure that it is effective and make necessary adjustments based on feedback.
2. Disciplinary Action:
Step 1: Inform the Employee
-
Clearly outline the nature of the alleged misconduct or performance issue, providing the employee with sufficient time to prepare for the meeting (5-7 days).
Step 2: Investigation and Evidence Gathering
-
Gather all relevant evidence, including interviews with witnesses, documents, and prior records of behavior.
Step 3: Disciplinary Hearing
-
Hold a hearing where the employee can explain their side, and ensure they are allowed to be accompanied by a colleague or union representative.
Step 4: Decision-Making
-
Based on the hearing and gathered evidence, determine the appropriate disciplinary action (e.g., warning, suspension, dismissal).
Step 5: Document and Communicate the Outcome
-
Provide the employee with a written summary of the outcome, reasons for the decision, and details about their right to appeal.
3. Flexible Working Requests:
Step 1: Acknowledge the Request
-
Acknowledge receipt of the flexible working request within 7 days, informing the employee about the timeline for a decision.
Step 2: Consultation
-
Hold a meeting with the employee to understand the request and assess how it may impact their role and the organization.
Step 3: Assess the Request
-
Evaluate the request based on operational needs, business impact, and any legal requirements.
Step 4: Communicate the Decision
-
Inform the employee of the outcome and explain whether the request is granted or denied.
Step 5: Monitor the Arrangement
-
Once granted, monitor the effectiveness of the arrangement and provide regular feedback.
4. Performance Management:
Step 1: Set Clear Expectations
-
Clearly communicate job expectations and performance goals at the beginning of employment and during performance reviews.
Step 2: Provide Ongoing Feedback
-
Regularly monitor employee performance, offering constructive feedback and support when needed.
Step 3: Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)
-
If performance issues persist, put the employee on a formal PIP with specific goals and a timeline for improvement.
Step 4: Review and Decision
-
After the PIP period, assess the employee’s progress and decide on the next steps, such as ending the PIP, extending it, or taking further action.
Step 5: Document and Communicate
-
Document all actions, meetings, and decisions, and communicate the outcome clearly to the employee.
5. Long-Term Absence Management:
Step 1: Early Contact
-
Maintain regular contact with the employee during their absence, offering support and assistance as needed.
Step 2: Request Medical Documentation
-
Ensure the employee provides updated medical certificates to verify the reason for their absence and estimate return date.
Step 3: Phased Return and Reasonable Adjustments
-
If the employee is able to return, offer a phased return to work with adjusted duties if necessary.
Step 4: Monitoring and Review
-
Monitor the employee’s progress and consider alternative solutions such as redeployment or long-term disability leave if needed.

Complex Case Examples
While the above procedures offer a general framework, certain cases may involve more complexity due to the nature of the issues involved. Here are some examples of complex cases that may require special attention.
1. Grievance: Discrimination Claim (Example)
Scenario:
An employee, Sarah, files a grievance against her manager, alleging discrimination based on her gender. Sarah claims she has been passed over for promotions and given less favorable projects compared to male colleagues with similar or less experience.
Investigation Process:
-
Step 1: Acknowledge the grievance promptly and inform Sarah of the process.
-
Step 2: Conduct interviews with Sarah, her manager, and colleagues to gather evidence regarding her claims.
-
Step 3: Review the company’s promotion records, performance reviews, and project allocations to determine if there is any evidence of gender-based discrimination.
-
Step 4: Analyze the data and policies to check if there are any discrepancies that suggest discriminatory behavior.
-
Step 5: Make a decision and communicate it to Sarah, outlining the findings and any corrective actions taken (e.g., additional training for the manager or revising promotion processes).
Complexity:
This case is complex because it involves a potential violation of anti-discrimination laws, requiring a thorough, unbiased investigation and careful handling of sensitive issues.
2. Disciplinary Action: Employee Under the Influence at Work (Example)
Scenario:
An employee, Mark, was observed by multiple colleagues acting unusually disoriented and smelling of alcohol during a team meeting. Upon being asked about his behavior, Mark admits to having consumed alcohol before coming to work.
Investigation Process:
-
Step 1: Notify Mark of the concern and schedule a meeting to discuss the situation.
-
Step 2: Gather statements from witnesses, and check Mark’s prior record to assess if this behavior is a pattern.
-
Step 3: Review the company’s substance abuse policy to determine the appropriate action.
-
Step 4: Conduct a formal hearing, allowing Mark to present his explanation.
-
Step 5: Based on the findings, decide on disciplinary action (e.g., suspension, mandatory counseling) and document everything thoroughly.
Complexity:
The complexity lies in the potential safety risks of Mark being under the influence while at work, the need to adhere to company policies regarding substance use, and the possible legal ramifications (e.g., if Mark is part of a safety-sensitive role).
3. Flexible Working Request: Conflicting Needs (Example)
Scenario:
An employee, Jenny, requests a permanent flexible working arrangement (working from home three days a week). However, her role requires regular face-to-face collaboration with a team, and her request conflicts with the operational needs of the department.
Investigation Process:
-
Step 1: Acknowledge Jenny’s request and hold a meeting to understand her reasons for the request and explore alternative options.
-
Step 2: Assess the operational impact of allowing the request and evaluate if the department can function effectively with this arrangement.
-
Step 3: Discuss possible compromises, such as a hybrid arrangement where Jenny works from home some days but attends key meetings in person.
-
Step 4: Communicate the decision to Jenny, providing a clear explanation of the outcome.
Complexity:
This case is complex due to the balancing act between accommodating the employee’s personal needs and maintaining business operations. It also requires careful consideration of fairness to other employees and legal compliance.
4. Long-Term Absence: Employee with Serious Health Condition (Example)
Scenario:
An employee, Kevin, has been on extended sick leave for six months due to a serious health condition. His doctor has provided frequent updates, but there is still no clear timeline for his return to work.
Investigation Process:
-
Step 1: Maintain regular contact with Kevin and his healthcare provider to understand his condition and prognosis.
-
Step 2: Review Kevin’s medical documentation and assess the likelihood of a full recovery and return to work.
-
Step 3: Consider potential reasonable adjustments or accommodations, such as a phased return or modified duties.
-
Step 4: Explore other options such as long-term disability leave if there is no clear end date for his absence.
-
Step 5: Communicate options to Kevin, ensuring that all decisions align with legal requirements for disability and sick leave.
Complexity:
This case is complex due to the prolonged nature of the absence and the need to balance support for the employee with the operational needs of the organization. Legal considerations around long-term disability and potential discrimination also add to the complexity.

HR Tribunal Insights
Understanding how tribunals work and preparing for potential claims is vital for every business:
-
Types of Employment Tribunal Cases – Common claims filed with tribunals, including unfair dismissal, discrimination, and grievances.
-
How to Avoid Tribunal Claims – Proactive steps businesses can take to reduce the likelihood of tribunal claims, such as robust HR policies and fair procedures.
-
Navigating Employment Tribunal Procedures – A step-by-step guide on how to handle claims, from early conciliation to tribunal hearings.
-
Case Studies from Employment Tribunals – Real examples of tribunal decisions and how businesses can learn from them.
-
Settling Disputes Without Tribunal – Alternative dispute resolution methods, including mediation and arbitration, to resolve disputes before they escalate to tribunal.

Investigation Report: Disciplinary Action for Chronic Tardiness
Employee Name: John Doe
Position: Senior Manager
Department: Operations
Investigator: Rachel Brown, HR Manager
Date of Investigation: June 2024
1. Background:
John Doe has been consistently late for team meetings on multiple occasions between March and June 2024. Despite several informal discussions, the tardiness has persisted, impacting team productivity.
2. Allegation:
John is alleged to have arrived late for at least 10 out of 12 scheduled meetings between March and June 2024 without providing adequate prior notice or valid reasons for his lateness.
3. Investigation Process:
Step 1: Evidence was collected from meeting attendance records and email communications.
Step 2: Interviews were conducted with John’s colleagues and supervisor.
Step 3: John was interviewed on June 10, 2024. He admitted to being late for meetings but attributed it to scheduling conflicts between departmental responsibilities.
4. Findings:
John’s tardiness was found to be a recurring issue. There was no evidence that he made any efforts to communicate his conflicts in a timely manner. This has had a noticeable impact on team operations.
5. Conclusion and Recommendation:
Based on the investigation, it is concluded that John’s actions constitute a violation of the company’s attendance policy. A formal written warning is recommended, along with mandatory training in time management.
6. Proposed Action:
-
Disciplinary Action: A formal written warning will be issued.
-
Training: John will be required to attend time management training.
-
Follow-Up: A review meeting will be scheduled in 30 days to evaluate improvements.
Investigator’s Signature:
Rachel Brown, HR Manager
Date: June 15, 2024
This example provides a comprehensive guide on how to structure the investigation report in a disciplinary case, ensuring clarity, thoroughness, and proper documentation.
Conclusion:
Handling complex employee relations cases requires consistent adherence to best practices, clear communication, and thorough investigation. By following these best practices and using detailed investigation reports, organizations can ensure that all employee relations matters are managed fairly, transparently, and legally.